by Phil Stafford
My earliest memory of the church is a received one. As Unitarians in the small town of Hobart, Indiana, in 1949, my parents brought me in my infancy to the congregation not to be “baptized”, of course, but to be welcomed. I am told that I was given a red rose to commemorate my entry into the church, which I accepted with a Whitmanesque yawlp, as the rose accidentally pricked my finger. Hence, from the beginning, I learned my church was a place for unbridled individual expression.
This emphasis on individual religious choice was supported on a regular basis as my brother and I, seeking release from Sunday morning shirt and tie would occasionally assert: “We’re Unitarians; we choose not to go to church today.” Our parents had no comeback for that.
Generally speaking, however, going to Sunday school was not burdensome. The church lay within a few blocks of home, easy walking distance through the always interesting small town neighborhood. It was the desirable small town atmosphere, with a New England-like Unitarian church that, indeed, drew my parents from Hyde Park in Chicago, with their three small children, to an 1850’s brick farmhouse only blocks from school and stores. I later learned from my mother the perhaps apocryphal tale that the Unitarian church in Hobart, founded in 1874, was a compromise alternative available to citizens tired of the feuding within the mainline Lutheran and Methodist congregations at the time.
Growing up Unitarian meant that as young people we were encouraged to be free thinking about religion. I recall studying a book titled “The Church Across the Street” and taking “field trips” to other churches and synagogues, with debriefing sessions afterwards. By junior high school we were seriously debating morality and politics – I remember being introduced in Sunday school to a map of South East Asia (Viet Nam) as a Freshman, in 1964. By 1967, I was fervently against the war, though on humanitarian and not specifically religious grounds.
As a junior in college at the University of Chicago, with a very high lottery number (34), I was fated to the draft and reclassified 1-A. As I felt it wrong to evade the draft through deception, I assembled a petition for status as a Conscientious Objector. While I could point to the influence of the church in forming my anti-war beliefs, the Unitarian church is not, per se, a “peace church” as it eschews dogma of all kinds. Hence, my petition for CO status was denied, yet my conscience was never fully tested as, soon after, General Hershey declared a complete moratorium on the draft (1972).
Now, thirty five years later, I see a war not unlike that encountered by my own young generation, with brave young people returning home in caskets and on stretchers, while arrogant leaders claim god to their side in a righteous battle of good and evil. It is, I think, this appropriation of religion for power on earth that I find most reprehensible about the entire institutional edifice of religion. Indeed, I feel that many people have turned away from “the church” for this very reason and sought a more personal spirituality.
For me, even spirituality, however, fills no void. Certainly I appreciate the mysteries of the universe. I have experienced total awe at the sight of Mt. Ranier, the power of a good thunderstorm, the blueness of the sky, the sweet smell of honeysuckle and the wonders of my daughter’s birth. I suppose these things and events might be considered spiritual in some sense, yet I see no compelling reason to lend transcendency to these things which are, in of themselves, in their own right, astonishingly present. These encounters leave me feeling not diminished but perhaps inconsequential while, paradoxically, enriched and privileged to have lived. Perhaps it is this notion of the numinous, the experience itself, unmediated by word, that, for some, approaches the spiritual. Yet, I believe the anchor of this experience lies in our humanity, not in our spirituality. It seems to me that the truth of the statement, “we are of one body”, lies in its literalness and, moreover, that this truth can provide the basis for a morality that can save the earth as we (should) know it. In this sense, religion is not part of my life. Faith in the potential goodness of people, however, is another story.
And death? For me, I foresee no transcendence beyond the memory of loved ones and the Einsteinian notion that matter can neither be created nor destroyed. My wish, as offered, again by Whitman:
The spotted hawk swoops by and accuses me, he complains of my gab and my loitering.I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,I sound my barbaric yawlp over the rooftops of the world.The last scud of day holds back for me,
It flings my likeness after the rest and true as any on the shadow'd wilds,
It coaxes me to the vapor and the dusk.I depart as air, I shake my white locks at the runaway sun,
I effuse my flesh in eddies, and drift it in lacy jags.I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,
If you want me again look for me under your boot-soles.You will hardly know who I am or what I mean,
But I shall be good health to you nevertheless,
And filter and fibre your blood.
Failing to fetch me at first keep encouraged,
Missing me one place search another,
I stop somewhere waiting for you.
(from Leaves of Grass)
Promoting respect and understanding of diverse spiritual practices and beliefs is the goal of a project for Bloomington called Stories of the Spirit. Hosted by a local group of volunteers, the project seeks to gather short personal histories and narratives from individuals of diverse backgrounds in Bloomington.Continue reading Stories of the Spirit >>